About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
Blog Article
Online access to case information for payments in decide on juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases could possibly be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
fourteen. During the light on the position explained previously mentioned, it's concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be thought of for no fault of his possess and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the duration of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID needed) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts for the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed because of the respondent/Institute, these rules might not have the operates within a transparent legal and regulatory framework with the respondent/Institute. 14. In view of what is discussed previously mentioned, without touching the merits from the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of your petition is sustained plus the petition is held for being not maintainable in terms of Article 199 of your Constitution to the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio from the judgment passed via the Supreme Court while in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is nicely-settled that although taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to take into account the benefit of the many qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of suitable candidates who will be found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked with the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of the respondent department.
The issue here is that an accused might say that they meant to injure the target, but they did not plan to eliminate them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted as a result of accused’s attack was neither foreseeable important family law cases nor intended.
Online access towards the case management system for your Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases could possibly be searched using name or case number.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station resulting from probable health risks and dangers.
Criminal cases In the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil regulation systems, common regulation systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.
She did note that the boy still needed comprehensive therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Secure with other children.” The boy was receiving counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved of the actions.
A reduced court might not rule against a binding precedent, even if it feels that it is actually unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. Should the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it may possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts with the cases; some jurisdictions allow for the judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.